Ms. Evans summarized Report COA2023-093. The purpose and effect is to recognize an existing Additional Residential Unit (ARU). Relief sought: Section 5.1.3 b) of the By-law permits accessory structures in the interior side or rear yard; the ARU is located in the front yard; Section 5.27 i) of the By-law permits a maximum of two additional residential dwelling units, one within the same building as the primary dwelling unit and one within an accessory building or structure; the ARU is within the second detached accessory structure on the property; and, Section 8.2 d) of the By-law requires a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres, plus an additional 10 metres from the centreline of the road allowance, required by Section 5.18.3 of the By-law; the existing setback is 4.4 metres from the front lot line and 14.4 metres from the centreline of the road allowance.
The Committee raised the following questions:
1) Is there a maximum number of accessory units permitted on the property?
Ms. Evans replied no, not in the Township of Verulam zoning by-law just a percentage of lot coverage.
2) Was a building permit issued for the park model trailer ARU but not a septic permit issued?
Ms. Murchison replied that no building permits have been issued for the park model trailer addition.
3) Will the applicant be seeking a building permit for the addition to the park model trailer?
Ms. Murchison replied we have a pending application and registration for the third unit and have been waiting for this minor variance application to be brought to the Committee.
The applicant, Ms. Phillips was present via electronic participation and spoke to the application and history of the property.
Ms. Murchison spoke to the enforcement file which was started in 2021 and is very comfortable proceeding with the minor variance application.
There were no further questions from the Committee or other persons.