Mr. Harding summarized Report COA2019-005, to request relief from provisions in order to permit a dwelling to be raised and construct an uncovered porch and stairs to access the raised main level. The application meets the four tests for minor variance.
Since the writing of the report, Staff identified that several comments had been received from the public and an agency. A letter of support from neighbour, Steve Lennox of 157 Hazel Street, was received January 9, 2019. He stated that the proposal would improve the neighbourhood. A letter in opposition from Ira Stuchberry on behalf of Liana and Horea Trifu of 71 Birchcliff Avenue, was received. They were opposed to raising the dwelling and felt it would obstruct their view of the lake and devalue their property. A letter of support from John Travers of 4 Hollyville Boulevard, a property within Greenhurst-Thurstonia beyond the required circulation area, was received just prior to the commencement of the meeting. He stated that the proposal would better the community. Comments were received from the Kawartha Region Conservation Authority, and they had no concerns with the proposal. No concerns were raised by other agencies.
The Committee asked whether a height increase was being sought as relief from height had not been applied for. Staff clarified that the variances were being requested to increase height and permit the construction/placement of a new access to the main door.
The Committee asked if the variance was for a full or half basement. Staff responded that the building contained a crawl space which proposed to be upgraded to a full basement. The Committee questioned whether the letter of objection affected staff’s evaluation of the application. Staff replied that it did not, as it is a well established principle that a landowner doesn't have the right to the protection of a view.
The Committee further asked for clarification regarding the protection of a view and staff’s examination of sightlines within the report. Staff replied that the sightline examination pertained to the operation of Hazel Street and the road allowance, not the protection of a view.
The owners, Paul and Kimberley Travers were present but did not speak.