Mr. Adebayo summarized report COA2018-032, and requested that the application be deferred until such time as the applicant can submit a revised application supportable by staff as the application does not meet all the tests.
The applicant, Mr. Meier was present and spoke. He said that a neighbour had a minor variance similar to his and it was accepted. He went on to say he wants to build on the exact footprint. He didn't want dormers as his neighbours have had problems with ice. Current driveway can accommodate two cars so not an issue. He stated he is currently replacing Septic system and planting shrubs along shoreline. The Committee looked for confirmation from staff as to the two parking spaces. Staff replied upon observation, there is not enough space for two cars as he must allow for the septic tank. The Committee questioned the applicant, saying that he is restricted for parking and how is it possible to have more parking space. The applicant replied he would move the septic/holding tank toward the shore as there is no weeping tile on the property. The Committee suggested a deferral until the applicant can submit new drawing for the driveway that compliments the size of dwelling.
Mr. Mike Allen was present in support of the application. He stated it is 1200 square feet in total, and couldn't see a problem. He is purely maximizing space, also dormer system is not functional. The applicant also added that he would move holding tank towards the lake to allow for more parking space.
The Committee asked staff if the two storey dwelling would have a height restriction. Staff replied no, that the by-law permits a maximum height of 11 metres but that the proposal doesn't meet the official plan policy which requires low profile dwellings instead. (The Committee wanted to know the difference between the structure proposed compared to another minor variance in the past). Staff responded by saying, the minor variance in the past was a one storey to a one and half storey dwelling. Relief was for the storey and a half. The current minor variance is for a one storey to a two storey. The issue is the increased size of the building and KRCA comments.