The Chair requested staff to advise on the manner of giving notice for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment. He also asked staff to briefly describe the proposal and summarize the correspondence, if any, received to date.
Mr. Holy confirmed that the required notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act for the Public Meeting held on July 14, 2021, and that this was an additional Public Meeting being held today. He summarized the application, explaining that it proposes to change to the R1-S14, R1-S15, R1-S16 and R1-S17 zones is to accommodate an encroachment of 1.5 m for any porch and an additional 1.5 m for any stairs beyond a porch in the front yard; and an encroachment of 1.8 m for any deck or stairs in the rear yard. The application is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and the Victoria County Official Plan. Mr. Holy summarized the comments received to date, as detailed in his report, noting that in consideration of the public comments received, additional measures are being proposed by staff in the zoning by-law including a 2.0 m privacy fence between the properties on Hillcroft and Front Streets, and a drainage swale to address flooding concerns. Staff are recommending that the application be forwarded to Council for approval. He responded to questions from Committee members.
The Chair inquired if the applicant wished to speak to the application.
Eldon Theodore of MHBC spoke on behalf of the developer, and noted that there had been discussions since the previous meeting to address the public concerns. He noted that since the proposed 2.0 m privacy fence would present a significant engineering, and long-term safety challenge to place on top of the armour stone retaining wall, that they would be willing to forego their rear yard deck and stair encroachment requests. Mr. Theodore and Mr. Saad Tabani (on behalf of Three Lakes Development) responded to questions from Committee members.
The Chair inquired if anyone wished to speak to the application.
Brian Levacic presented a series of questions including how a privacy fence could be constructed on the retaining wall, if the height of the fence would still ensure privacy, and what would prevent people from building decks in the future if the developers proposal is approved. The Chair permitted Mr. Theodore responded to the questions from Mr. Levacic.
No other persons spoke to the application.
The Public Meeting concluded at 1:46 p.m.